Comments on: Career options for Women’s Studies graduates

By: Chad P

Chad P — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:19:57 +0000

The military defined sex as missionary position intercourse between a man and a woman. Anything else was considered sodomy and was thus punishable under the UCMJ.

Based on those standards, it'd be pretty damned easy to avoid "sex."

By: L. Belle

L. Belle — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:35:21 +0000

I just watched an interview Natalie gave. Evidently, she's plenty experienced with oral. But still a virgin, because that's not really sex. I wonder what else isn't really sex.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG-6AP8DIOU“target=”_blank”>www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG-6AP8DIOU

By: Crazy_Ivan

Crazy_Ivan — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:00:38 +0000

That depends on what your definition of "is" is.

By: Crazy_Ivan

Crazy_Ivan — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:15:10 +0000

I suppose she deserves whatever she can convince some stupid schmuck to pay her. I just think the hype surrounding virginity os overrated. Just because she's a virgin doesn't mean her twizzle is worth 3.8 Million. But if that's what she gets paid, more power to her. She'll have enough money to retire and she'll finally know what they meant in her classes when they talked about the "tool of the patriarchy."

By: L. Belle

L. Belle — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:06:41 +0000

Actually, I'm impressed. That's some brilliant marketing and ballsy entrepreneurship right there. From a Women's Studies graduate. Wow, who'd have thought? She deserves whatever she can convince someone to pay her, imo.

By: JoshR

JoshR — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:52:05 +0000

Yeah, I blocked it out. Kinda like my after school bible study classes. Nothing happened.

By: Crazy_Ivan

Crazy_Ivan — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:46:31 +0000

Oops! That was actually supposed to be $700 billion with a "B". I just have a hard time counting that high.

By: JoshR

JoshR — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:34:32 +0000

Oh come on, anyone can throw $700 million dollars at a problem and not see results. It's not like they did it twice…

By: Crazy_Ivan

Crazy_Ivan — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:28:57 +0000

Exactly my point. What kind of jackass pays 3.8 Million dollars for a piece of ass? That's like paying $700 million to the banking industry and then watching the market continue to plummet. Nobody's that stupid.

By: JoshR

JoshR — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:13:16 +0000

She deserves every cent, if for nothing else than establishing the precedent. I really hope this keeps getting publicity so more women will follow in her foot steps. Well maybe not foot steps….butt print? Knowing the sophistication level of the media I don't doubt it will run for a good long time. With prices like these it won't be long before every Tina, Dian, and Harriet is selling off cherries like they're at a ice cream convention. It won't be long before the market is saturated and eventually the bubble will burst… or the cherry will pop.

In either case I couldn't care less. The world needs fewer virgins and fewer people who hold chastity and virginity up as some sacred thing. Hopefully this will get more people to actually think "what is it worth and why?" The only losers in this are the jackasses paying for virginity. Seriously, that's like hiring a blind painter to do your portrait.